Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists. Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. This paper provides a consensus regarding the reporting requirements for medical meta-analysis and has been highly influential in ensuring good reporting practice and standardizing language in evidence-based medicine, with further guidance for protocols, individual patient data meta-analyses and animal studies.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. A critique for meta-analyses and the productivity-diversity relationship. Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Meta-analyses and mega-mistakes: calling time on meta-analysis of the species richness-productivity relationship.
Meta-analysis of magnitudes, differences and variation in evolutionary parameters. Making sense of meta-analysis: a critique of “effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy”. Uses and misuses of meta-analysis in plant ecology. The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. in The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis 2nd edn (eds Cooper, H. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine. in The Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution (eds Koricheva, J.
0 kommentar(er)
